Start Free

COMPARE YOUR OPTIONS

Board Game Design Software: Every Option, Honestly Compared

There is no single best tool for making a board game. There are good tools for each stage, and one decision about whether you want to run five of them or one. This guide covers both — including where Boardssey is the wrong choice.

See the full comparison

THE REAL COST

Most designers are running five tools that don’t talk to each other

Ask a working board game designer what they use and you rarely get one answer. You get a list: a spreadsheet for card data, a layout tool for the cards themselves, a forms tool for playtest feedback, a doc for the rulebook, a board for tasks, and a folder somewhere holding the sell sheet.

Each tool is fine. The stack is the problem. Card data lives in one place and the card layout in another, so every balance change is entered twice. Playtest feedback arrives as form responses that never make it back to the rule they were about. The sell sheet is rebuilt from scratch every time a publisher asks, because nothing that fed it is connected.

Duplicate data entry

Change a card’s cost and you update the spreadsheet, the layout file, the print-and-play export, and the rulebook. Four edits for one decision.

Feedback that goes nowhere

Playtest notes arrive in forms, Discord, and scribbled sheets. By the time you sort them, the session is three weeks cold.

Rebuilt pitch material

Every publisher request means rebuilding a sell sheet from files scattered across four tools — under a deadline.

A FRAMEWORK

Five questions worth answering before you pick anything

Tool comparisons usually start with feature lists. Start here instead — the answers rule out most of the market in about a minute.

What stage are you actually stuck at?

Most designers do not need a better tool for everything. They need a better tool for the one stage where work keeps stalling. Fix that first.

How many games are you carrying?

One game rewards a deep single-purpose tool. Five games rewards something that holds them all in one place — the overhead of switching multiplies per project, not per task.

Who else touches the work?

Solo means you can use anything. The moment co-designers, artists, or external playtesters are involved, per-seat pricing and file-sharing friction start setting your real cost.

Do you need print-ready output, or just a playable prototype?

These are different problems. Prototyping tools optimise for speed of iteration; manufacturing prep optimises for bleed, CMYK, and spec compliance. Very few tools do both well.

Are you pitching to publishers, or self-publishing?

Pitching means sell sheets, portfolios, and outreach tracking. Self-publishing means manufacturing specs, crowdfunding assets, and fulfilment. Different tools, different endings.

STAGE 1 · IDEATION

For getting ideas out of your head

This is the stage most designers already have a tool for, and it is usually a general one. That is fine — it is also where the scattering starts, because a generic doc has no idea what a game is.

Notion

Free personal tier · paid from ~$10–12 per user / month

The default choice, and genuinely good at it. Databases, docs, and templates are flexible enough to model almost anything, and there are community board game design templates worth starting from.

Where it wins: flexibility, and you probably already know it.

Where it falls down: you are building and maintaining the system yourself. Per-user pricing gets expensive once playtesters and collaborators need access, and nothing in Notion understands components, print sheets, or playtest sessions natively.

Milanote

Free tier · paid around $12.50 / month

A visual corkboard for early, messy thinking — mood boards, loose references, and half-formed mechanics pinned next to each other.

Where it wins: genuinely pleasant for mood boards and loose idea capture.

Where it falls down: it stops at ideation. Nothing carries forward into prototyping or testing.

Miro

Free tier · paid from ~$8–16 per user / month

An infinite whiteboard, strong for collaborative sessions and mapping how systems connect.

Where it wins: real-time collaboration on a shared canvas.

Where it falls down: per-user pricing, and boards become their own kind of mess at scale.

Boardssey — Game Center + Whiteboard

Included in every plan · unlimited seats

Purpose-built: rules, versions, notes, media, components, and mechanics in one hub per game, with a whiteboard attached.

Where it wins: it already knows what a game is, so there is no system to build, and collaborators are free.

Where it falls down: less flexible than Notion if you want to model something unusual, and it will not replace Notion for the non-game parts of your life.

Bottom line: If you are organising one game and already live in Notion, stay there. If you are carrying several games or repeatedly rebuilding the same structure, a purpose-built hub pays for itself quickly.

STAGE 2 · PROTOTYPING

For turning ideas into cards, boards, and tokens

This is the most crowded and most specialised category, and the one where dedicated tools genuinely beat the generalists.

nanDECK

Free · Windows

The power user tool, and a legitimate institution in this hobby. Script-driven card generation from a spreadsheet: change the data, regenerate the whole deck.

Where it wins: nothing beats it for automation depth, and the price is zero.

Where it falls down: a scripting language and a steep learning curve. Windows only. The interface is functional, not friendly.

Dextrous

Free tier (2 projects) · paid from ~$48 / year

Positioned between Canva and nanDECK — a fast visual interface with CMYK exports suitable for manufacturers.

Where it wins: the best balance of speed and print-readiness in the category, and the free tier is genuinely usable.

Where it falls down: scoped to component design. Your rules, playtests, and pitch material live elsewhere.

Component.Studio

Free tier · paid around $10–12 / month

Spreadsheet-driven component generation with print-on-demand integrations built in.

Where it wins: the data-to-component pipeline, and direct routes to manufacturing.

Where it falls down: also single-purpose, and pricier than Dextrous for comparable work.

Canva, Figma & InDesign

Free to ~$23 / month

General design tools pressed into service for card and board layout.

Where it wins: Figma and InDesign give you real typographic and layout control, and InDesign remains the standard for final print preparation.

Where it falls down: none of them are data-driven by default. Changing one value across 80 cards is manual work — and that is exactly the change you make most often.

Boardssey — Toolkit

Included in every plan

Print and Play generation, card tools, 3D mockups, a TTS deck editor, and variable distribution, connected to the game data you already entered.

Where it wins: the data is already there, so components regenerate from the source of truth instead of a second copy.

Where it falls down: this is the honest one — Boardssey is not a graphic design tool. For high-end art direction and print-ready layout you will still want InDesign or Figma, and for deep scripted automation nanDECK goes further.

Bottom line: For final art, use a real design tool. For fast iteration on data-driven components, use something data-driven — nanDECK if you want power and do not mind scripting, Dextrous if you want speed.

STAGE 3 · PLAYTESTING

For finding out whether it actually works

Most designers test more than they document, and lose most of what testing tells them. The tooling gap here is wider than anywhere else in the pipeline.

Tabletop Simulator

~$19.99 one-time on Steam · often ~$9.99 on sale

The standard for digital play. A physics sandbox where you can build and play almost anything with people anywhere.

Where it wins: remote playtesting with real people, a huge community, and a one-time price that is very hard to argue with.

Where it falls down: building a table takes real effort, it demands Steam and a decent machine from every participant, and it captures zero structured feedback. What happened in the session stays in the session.

Tabletopia

Free tier · paid subscriptions for more concurrent games

Browser-based digital play, so there is nothing for your testers to install.

Where it wins: the lowest possible barrier for a remote tester — you send a link.

Where it falls down: less flexible than Tabletop Simulator, and the free tier is limited. Same feedback gap.

Google Forms + Sheets

Free

What most designers actually use for structured feedback after a session.

Where it wins: free, universal, and everyone already knows how to fill in a form.

Where it falls down: responses are disconnected from the game version they refer to. Three months in, you have a spreadsheet of opinions with no reliable way to tie them back to what the rules were at the time.

Boardssey — Playtest Hub

Unlimited playtests on every plan

Structured sessions tied to a specific game version, with feedback captured against it and collaborators included at no extra cost.

Where it wins: feedback stays attached to what was actually being tested, and external playtesters do not cost a seat.

Where it falls down: it is not a digital table. You still play in person, or on Tabletop Simulator or Tabletopia.

Bottom line: These are complements, not competitors. Play on Tabletop Simulator or Tabletopia; capture what you learn somewhere structured. The common failure is doing the first well and the second not at all.

STAGE 4 · PITCHING

For getting it in front of publishers

The stage with the fewest dedicated tools and the highest stakes. Almost everyone improvises here.

Google Slides, PowerPoint & Canva

Free to ~$15 / month

The default sell sheet toolkit, and the one most designers reach for first.

Where it wins: fast, familiar, and a well-made Canva sell sheet looks completely professional.

Where it falls down: every sell sheet is built by hand from information that already exists elsewhere. Update the player count and you update it in four documents.

InDesign

~$23 / month via Creative Cloud

The professional choice for a polished one-sheet or a full rulebook.

Where it wins: total control over the result, and the output standard publishers expect.

Where it falls down: overkill for a single page, with a learning curve to match, and still entirely manual.

Portfolio sites

Free to ~$16 / month

Squarespace, Carrd, or a public Notion page for designers who want a linkable catalogue.

Where it wins: a real, public presence you can point a publisher at.

Where it falls down: another surface to maintain, drifting out of date the moment a game changes.

Boardssey — Sell Sheet Designer + Catalog

Sell Sheet Designer from Pathfinder up

Sell sheets generated from the game data already in the system, plus a shareable catalogue and contact tracking for outreach.

Where it wins: the pitch material is downstream of the source of truth, so it does not drift, and outreach lives next to the game instead of in a separate sheet.

Where it falls down: less design freedom than building it yourself in InDesign. If you want control over every element, build it by hand.

Bottom line: If you pitch once a year, Canva is fine. If you pitch regularly, or carry several games, generating sell sheets from live data removes a recurring and genuinely unpleasant chore.

STAGE 5 · PROJECT MANAGEMENT

For keeping it all moving

The most crowded software category on earth, and almost none of it is built for this work.

Trello

Free tier · paid from ~$5–12 per user / month

Kanban, simply. The most common first PM tool for solo designers.

Where it wins: anyone can use it in five minutes.

Where it falls down: you will outgrow it, and it knows nothing about games.

Asana, Monday & ClickUp

Free tiers · paid from ~$9–20 per user / month

Serious project management tools with deep feature sets and mature integrations.

Where it wins: powerful, mature, and genuinely good at complex project tracking.

Where it falls down: built for software and marketing teams. You will spend real time bending them into a shape that fits game development, and per-seat pricing punishes you for involving collaborators.

Notion

Free personal tier · paid from ~$10–12 per user / month

One tool for both project management and documentation, if you are willing to build it.

Where it wins: docs and tasks in the same place, fully customisable.

Where it falls down: you are still the one building and maintaining it, and per-user pricing applies as your group grows.

Boardssey — Project Dashboard

Included in every plan · unlimited seats

Tasks, tags, calendar, and roles, with everything attached to the game rather than sitting beside it.

Where it wins: no setup, and collaborators are free regardless of how many you add.

Where it falls down: less powerful than Asana or ClickUp in raw PM terms. If you need complex dependency chains and resource management, a dedicated PM tool goes deeper.

Bottom line: If you already run a PM tool and it works, keep it. The argument for switching is not features — it is whether your tasks should live in the same place as the game they belong to.

THE OTHER APPROACH

Or: one tool instead of five

Everything above assumes you assemble a stack. The other option is a platform that covers all five stages, which is what Boardssey is for. Every plan includes the full toolkit, with unlimited seats, priced by how many games you manage rather than how many people touch them.

The honest case for it is not that any single piece beats the best dedicated tool. It is that the pieces are connected, so the same data flows from idea to components to playtests to sell sheet without being re-entered.

Boardssey is a good fit if

You are managing more than one game at a time

You work with collaborators, artists, or external playtesters and resent paying per seat

You keep re-entering the same information in different tools

You pitch to publishers regularly and rebuild sell sheets each time

You want to stop maintaining a system and start using one

Boardssey is the wrong choice if

You need professional print-ready layout control — use InDesign

You want deep scripted component automation — use nanDECK, which is free and goes further

You want a 3D digital table to play on — use Tabletop Simulator

You are building one game, one time, and your current setup works fine

You prefer one-time purchases to subscriptions

Adventurer

5 games

Solo designers and hobbyists testing first ideas

Pathfinder

20 games

Active creators prototyping, pitching, and collaborating

Oracle

Unlimited games

Studios, publishers, and teams managing multiple games

Every plan includes the entire toolkit and unlimited seats. 14-day free trial. Sell Sheet Designer is available from Pathfinder up.

See full pricing

SIDE BY SIDE

The whole landscape, in one table

Tool

Best for

Covers

Pricing

Seats

Boardssey

The whole workflow

All 5 stages

From ~$5 / month

Unlimited

nanDECK

Automated component generation

Prototyping

Free

n/a

Dextrous

Fast, print-ready components

Prototyping

Free tier / ~$48 per year

Per account

Component.Studio

Data-driven components and print-on-demand

Prototyping

Free tier / ~$10 per month

Per account

Tabletop Simulator

Remote digital play

Playtesting

~$20 one-time

Per player

Tabletopia

Browser-based digital play

Playtesting

Free tier / paid

Per player

Notion

Flexible docs and databases

Ideation, PM

Free / ~$10 per user

Per user

Trello

Simple task tracking

Free / ~$5 per user

Per user

Miro

Collaborative whiteboarding

Ideation

Free / ~$8 per user

Per user

Canva

Quick sell sheets and graphics

Prototyping, pitching

Free / ~$15 per month

Per user

InDesign

Professional print layout

Prototyping, pitching

~$23 per month

Per user

Google Forms

Free feedback collection

Playtesting

Free

Unlimited

Pricing checked September 2026 and shifts often — verify current rates before relying on them.

PICK YOUR PATH

What we would actually recommend

Different situations, different answers. Find the one that sounds like you.

You are designing your first game

Use free tools. nanDECK or the Dextrous free tier for components, Google Forms for feedback, whatever doc tool you already like. Do not pay for anything until you know the hobby sticks. If you would rather not assemble it yourself, the Adventurer plan starts at the low end with a 14-day trial.

You are an active designer with several games

This is where a stack starts costing more than it saves. Either commit to connecting your tools properly, or move to something already connected. Keep Tabletop Simulator for remote play either way.

You are a studio or a team

Per-seat pricing is your real enemy — it quietly taxes every collaborator you add. Prioritise tools with unlimited seats, and keep InDesign for final production work.

You are a publisher evaluating submissions

You need catalogue and pipeline visibility more than design tools. Look at Oracle, or a dedicated PM tool if your process is already established and working.

MAKING THE MOVE

What switching actually looks like

The honest answer: do not migrate everything at once. Nobody successfully moves five tools in a weekend, and trying is how people conclude a new tool did not work.

Start with one game

Preferably an active one, not your most precious one. Set it up in parallel with your current stack during the 14-day trial.

Bring your data in

Card data and component spreadsheets can be imported rather than retyped.

Run one real playtest through it

This is the actual test. If the feedback loop feels better, the rest follows.

Add your collaborators

Seats are unlimited, so there is no cost to bringing in your whole group.

Move the rest when it is clearly better

Not before.

What comes over easily

Component and card data, game documentation, images and media, and task lists.

What needs rebuilding

Anything highly custom in your current setup — bespoke Notion databases, custom nanDECK scripts, and final art files, which stay in your design tool regardless.

FROM PEOPLE WHO SWITCHED

What designers say after moving

Real workflows, real results, real creators.

Read the post
The All-in-One Platform Reshaping How Board Games Get Made
"I’m really impressed by what Boardssey offers to designers, whether they’re looking to pitch to publishers or self-publish. The interface is clearly designed from the ground up with game designers in mind."
Jamey Stegmaier
Industry Expert, Lead Designer & President of Stonemaier Games
"Boardssey has helped me by giving me so many tools that makes it possible to complete 'boilerplate' processes.

Everything in one place makes it easy to keep your content organized and impactful.
Task management is also really solid."
Chris Eastridge
Founder of Moon Saga Workshop
“I’m not sure I’d recommend becoming a board game designer — it’s a rocky road.
But if you’re already heading that way, consider getting Boardssey. It makes your life so much easier.
It keeps the whole design process smooth and organized, giving you more time to actually design games. It’s an awesome tool for every board game professional.”
Petr Čáslava
Game Designer & Developer
"Boardssey combines the power of top project management tools with essential features tailored for professionals in the board game industry.
It has streamlined my workflow, saving valuable time and resources while providing my team with a clear overview of each project’s progress."
Renato Simões
Game Designer & Founder of UaiPiá
"If you work with board games, Boardssey is the tool you need.
It combines all the basic tools for planning, designing, and testing a new game, whether from an editorial perspective or as an independent game creator.
It is an essential part of our day-to-day operations.
Highly recommended!"
Leandro Nunes
Game Designer & Founder of Adoleta Jogos
"I just wanted to give Boardssey a try, and I was blown away!
It’s so cool and well-thought-out, feels like they’ve considered everything!
From organizing ideas to setting a clean design standard, it’s incredibly impressive."
André Teruya
Game Designer & Founder of Teruya Jogos
"I have been looking for an app like Boardssey for a long time.
The tools it provides make it an order of magnitude better than any other software I have used for creating games."
Greg Loumeau
Game Designer, Educator & Founder of Pouch Games
"I have found Boardssey to be a highly effective tool in keeping my projects on target and on pace.
So far this tool has exceeded my expectations! It has great support and consistent improvements based on its users feedback - combine these with a great idea and there is no stopping Boardssey! I highly recommend giving this tool a shot!"
Brad & Ellouise Shirley
Founders of Riverside Realm
"I just wanted to give Boardssey a try, and I was blown away!
It’s so cool and well-thought-out, feels like they’ve considered everything!
From organizing ideas to setting a clean design standard, it’s incredibly impressive."
André Teruya
Game Designer & Founder of Teruya Jogos